You need to login before you can view or download document
ASSESSMENT OF SUGAR POLARISATION USING AN ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY METHOD
By JD SNOAD
A STUDY of the potential for using an electrical conductivity (EC) method for
sugar polarisation (pol) assessment was undertaken during 2004. The method
involves measuring EC in a 27o brix solution of the sugar being assessed, and
using the result to calculate the purity. This in turn is used in conjunction with an
infrared moisture analysis to calculate the pol. The results of this study were
encouraging and the decision was taken to implement the method routinely for
shift sugar analysis. The method has been in use for three seasons and has
performed well. Over this period the standard error of prediction (SEP,
calculated as the standard deviation of the difference between the results for
conventional and EC pol methods) has been 0.093oZ, with 95% of results being
within 0.189oZ. The best performance was for the 2006 season when the SEP
was 0.077oZ, with 95% of results being within 0.152oZ. This compares
favourably with conventional sugar pol analysis repeatability of 0.147oZ.
Maintaining a calibration equation that adequately represents the relationship
between EC and sugar purity has been found to be integral to achieving good
results. The precision of results returned using the EC method has been shown to
be related to the precision of the analyst undertaking the analysis used for
calibration. As such, having a competent analyst undertake this work is
advantageous. The EC sugar pol assessment method offers advantages over the
conventional method for routine shift analysis. It is simple, requires little
analytical skill, experience or training to undertake, and has a high degree of
repeatability. It is also significantly faster to complete than the conventional
method. The adoption of this method in conjunction with an EC method for the
assessment of pan product true purity has allowed a significant reduction in
laboratory manning without a reduction in the analytical output. Both methods
also have the advantage of allowing large numbers of samples to be analysed
during trials with far less work than conventional methods.