You need to login before you can view or download document
SUGARCANE YIELD MONITORING IN THE HERBERT DISTRICT
By LP DI BELLA; M SEFTON; S MARRERO; E PONCE; F FERNANDEZ; M ESQUIVEL; R COVENTRY
SUGARCANE yield mapping began in the Herbert District in the 1998 crushing
season. A prototype cane yield monitor was developed and field tested, and
produced yield maps of the harvested areas. Interest in cane yield monitoring
systems was regenerated in the region when the Cuban Techagro company field
tested a yield monitor, during the 2005 harvest. In 2006, staff of the Herbert
Cane Productivity Services Limited (HCPSL) and others travelled to Brazil and
Cuba to review yield monitoring systems and were successful in obtaining a
Federal Government Regional Communities Project grant to assess and install
yield monitoring equipment to the Herbert harvesting fleet for the 2007 and
2008 harvests. Twenty Techagro yield monitors were in operation in the region
in 2008. Techagro and Techagro Pacific have undertaken research to assess the
efficacy of its yield monitoring system and to develop calibration methods, and
have delivered a user-friendly computer interface to process and generate yield
maps. Development of this system is ongoing and is being modified to meet
client requirements. Geo-spatial data such as yield maps, block boundaries and
soils maps have allowed the industry to identify and gain a better understanding
of why yield variation occurs within a cane block. Yield variations may differ
between blocks and seasons, and can usually be attributed to single factors, such
as cane grub invasion, or to multiple factors, such as a combination of poor soil
profile drainage and wet weather. Understanding the reasons for yield variation
is still a major challenge for the industry to consider when implementing
precision agricultural techniques.