You need to login before you can view or download document
BREEDING IMPLICATIONS OF DIVERSIFYING END USES OF SUGARCANE
By NILS BERDING; RHYLEE S PENDRIGH
USE of biomass as a renewable energy resource is particularly well advanced in
maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ethanol production from
grain, while well developed, has raised serious concerns regarding such use of
food sources. The emphasis now is technology development allowing use of the
non-grain component of food crops. Sugarcane (Saccharum spp hybrids),
particularly in Brazil, has followed a similar pathway, yet the consequences for
crop improvement are essentially unexplored. The objective of this paper is to
consider three key genetic statistics to predict the likely success of crop
improvement activities satisfying the demands arising from four diversified-use
scenarios:- sucrose and constrained fibre, Brix and constrained fibre, Brix and
moderate fibre, and total biomass. This is done without all necessary
technologies and relative economic weightings that the different quality
components may attract in each scenario being available. Data came from
harvests of eight Progeny Assessment Trial populations and 17 harvests over
11 trials of four Final Assessment Trial populations, conducted over four years
from BSES Meringa. Analyses yielded estimates of broad sense heritability (g2)
and genetic coefficient of variation (GCV %) for Brix, commercial cane sugar
(CCS), dry matter (DM), and fibre. The genetic correlations (rG) between the six
trait pairs were computed. All g2 values were high (> 0.66) indicating likely
success for selection for all traits. The GCV% values for fibre were the only
ones higher than CCS, a trait traditionally considered to suffer restricted
variation. Progress from selection for some of the scenarios considered may
suffer from a lack of variation in existing germplasm. The rG values between
Brix and CCS, Brix and DM, and DM and fibre were all strong. Those between
Brix and fibre, CCS and DM, and CCS and fibre were weak. None were
considered detrimental to achieving the four use scenarios. A restructuring of
germplasm may be necessary. There is scant knowledge of fibre-component
variations, yet manipulation of these, particularly for lower lignin, appears
inevitable. Technologies from the active R&D environments associated with
major energy-attractive crops may be transferable. However, cost-effective
analytical techniques to screen and manipulate fibre-quality components in
sugarcane crop improvement programs will need development.