ASSESSMENT OF SUGARCANE YIELD MONITORING TECHNOLOGY FOR PRECISION AGRICULTURE
By T JENSEN; C BAILLIE; R BRAMLEY; L Di BELLA; C WHITEING; R DAVIS
WITHIN the Australian Sugar industry a number of attempts have been
made to monitor yield variation across a block. These have ranged from
the early yield monitoring systems based on discrete mass measurement,
to the current focus of predicting yield via surrogate measurements based
on chopper pressure, feed train roller displacement and elevator power.
This paper describes an independent evaluation of commercially available
mass flow sensors that was conducted to assess current performance of
yield monitoring options while identifying opportunities for developing
improved cane yield monitoring systems. Three yield monitoring systems
which were commercially available in 2008 (AgGuide, TechAgro and
MTData) were fitted to a BSES-owned CH2500 Cameco harvester. Trials
were conducted during the 2008 and 2009 seasons in the Ingham district
of North Queensland. Each yield monitoring system was assessed
simultaneously to eliminate the influence of machine setup and site
characteristics that would be encountered through independently
assessing each unit. During the trial, the harvester was operated according
to Harvesting Best Practice (HBP). In addition to yield monitoring,
sugarcane yield was also measured using a weigh bin in order to
determine the absolute accuracy and resolution of the respective yield
monitoring systems. Weigh bin and mill weight data were used to assess
the yield monitors at a range of scales including; 50 m of row, full rows,
multiple rows (i.e. plot of 9 rows) and the entire field. These assessments
were made with the harvester operating at both high and low pour rates.
Only the TechAgro unit was found to provide results that were
sufficiently accurate to be considered as a potentially viable sugarcane
yield monitor. Performance of this unit was, however substantiallyreduced at high pour rates and this sensor was unable to account for
changing pour rates. Recommendations for further refining the devices
and for additional work are included.