You need to login before you can view or download document
EVALUATION OF CROP GROWTH MODELLING TO SUPPORT ESTIMATES OF SEASONAL CANE YIELD FOR THREE MILL ZONES IN SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND
By G KINGSTON
FORECASTS of mill zone seasonal cane yield are required by sugar industry sectors at a
range of lead times before the crushing season to facilitate forward sale of sugar and for
planning the logistics of the crushing season. There have been significant reductions in
milling staff allocations to yield estimation in recent decades and mills are seeking
additional objective tools to support subjective yield estimates. Simulation modelling
has been used for routine estimation of seasonal yield in South Africa since 2001 and at
research level to selected regions in Australia since 2005. This paper documents
relevant research undertaken for the Bundaberg, Isis and Maryborough mill zones.
APSIM 7.0 was used to simulate yields of irrigated autumn and spring plant cane and
first ratoon cane from an autumn plant crop grown on two soil types. Simulated yield
for assessment dates of 28 February, 30 March, 30 April and 15 September were
correlated with actual seasonal yield. Simulation for one soil type and only the average
of irrigated autumn and spring planting sequences provided a simple and effective
procedure for yield indexing. Initial results showed higher correlations between
simulated and actual yield at Bundaberg than for the other two regions. The final
predictive model was based on correlations of simulated yield for Bundaberg with
actual yields in all regions. Coefficients of determination for regression of simulated
yield with actual yield ranged between 0.79 and 0.90 for March and April assessment
dates, with root mean square errors for this period ranging between 3.1 and 4.9 tonnes
cane/ha for 1999 to 2008 seasons. Model-based estimates were 83 to 100% successful
in indexing the magnitude of seasonal yield relative to actual yield of the previous year
between 1999 and 2010 at the end of February when only semi-quantitative yield
estimates are required. Simple model based applications may therefore be further
developed to support current subjective yield estimating techniques.